Instead, users must request changes in the discussion section during negotiations, which can create unnecessary friction for parties Limited negotiation functionality: it’s not possible to track changes on contracts using Avokaado.No native eSignature: unlike Juro which has advanced native eSignature functionality, Avokaado users will have to rely on a third party eSignature provider in order to get contracts signed .Some additional limitations of Avokaado include: Similarly, Avokaado’s negotiation features are less advanced than those in Juro, since the platform doesn’t support tracked changes and comments must be left in the in-doc discussion to request these changes. This is distinct from Juro where users can add an unlimited number of custom fields, rich media and custom branding to create beautifully designed contracts in seconds.
Metabase pricing software#
Whilst the software appears to provide a comprehensive contract tool for legal professionals, some of the features it does offer are limited, which creates unnecessary friction throughout the contract workflow.įor instance, their contract editing tool is extremely basic, with very simple formatting capabilities. The software has a basic text editor, a discussion section for documents and a contract repository, which is fitted with a real-time dashboard so that you can keep track of your contracts’ progress. Avokaado limitationsĪs a contract lifecycle management software, Avokaado seeks to streamline the entire contract lifecycle for legal teams. This page explores the features, limitations and pricing of Avokaado, comparing it to Juro's all-in-one contract automation platform.
But are Avokaado’s features advanced and intuitive enough to enable legal and business teams to create, edit, negotiate, approve, sign and manage contracts at scale?
Avokaado is designed to help law firms and legal departments manage their contracts more efficiently.